Files
photocraft/book/src/README.md
T
1fe689a7bf docs: add mdBook and security documentation foundation (#35)
* docs: add mdBook and security documentation foundation

* docs: point book links at storytold/photocraft; scope the credits entry

The book's repository/edit URLs and source links pointed at the contributor's
fork. The credits entry now describes what this PR contributed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Brandon Thomas <echelon@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-04 12:31:18 -04:00

2.2 KiB

PhotoCraft Documentation

PhotoCraft is a native image editor written in Rust. This book is the maintained entry point for installation, architecture, formats, automation, development, and security documentation.

The repository's existing docs/ directory remains authoritative for detailed design notes, parity reports, UI conventions, release procedures, and the complete control-protocol method reference. The book links to those documents instead of copying them.

Start here

Documentation for coding agents

Coding agents should read the following in order:

  1. AGENTS.md for repository rules and verification gates.
  2. README.md for product scope and current entry points.
  3. book/src/architecture/ for crate boundaries and command flow.
  4. book/src/automation/ before driving the CLI, control protocol, or MCP server.
  5. book/src/security/ before changing a parser, file I/O, automation, MCP, the control server, command execution, or serialization/deserialization.

Agents must treat document bytes, paths, command parameters, and automation messages as untrusted input. A page that describes a proposed control does not mean that control is implemented.

Status language

Security pages use four labels consistently:

  • Implemented: behavior confirmed in current source or tests.
  • Known limitation: an exposed risk or missing control in current source.
  • Proposed: a design direction that is not enforced by the current build.
  • Future hardening: useful follow-up work without an accepted implementation yet.