* XFA: one script thread per event, and the live form kept up to date in place A form with hundreds of calculate scripts used to spend its open-time budget on set-up: every script got a thread of its own, and the engine dropped its live form after every value a script settled, rebuilding the whole tree for the next script. The js crate gains xfa_session::XfaSession: the scripts of one event run on one thread (with the script stack), each in a fresh JavaScript context or FormCalc interpreter on a copy of the form as the engine holds it then, so scripts share nothing, a script that fails halfway leaves nothing behind, and what a script changed reaches the next one only through the engine. A script past its time limit is abandoned on the thread and the session is dead from then on; a fault in the engine (a panic) loses only that script, the thread is replaced. On wasm the scripts run inline, as before. The engine's runner keeps one session per event and, for a value, now refreshes the one field in its live form in place (xfa::refresh_value, computing the value as the tree builder would: saved values, template defaults) instead of rebuilding the tree; rows, presence, access, resets, relayouts and data rewrites still rebuild it. Under test, the live form is compared with a fresh build before every script and at the end of every event, and a difference ends the test binary (a panic would be caught by the engine's guard and turned into a script error). 210 calculate scripts (one per row of 10 sections x 20 rows, plus a sum per section), debug build, instrumented inside the engine: the script event on open 495 ms -> 204 ms (of which live-form rebuilds 217 ms -> 0), on a change 300 ms -> 172 ms; through the tools, layout included, open 1.27 s -> 0.97 s and a change 0.44 s -> 0.22 s. The rebuild cost removed grew with form size times script count. * CI: the GoToR tests' case lists are only grown on Unix, so Windows must not warn on their mut
pdfcraft-engine
The façade every frontend talks to. It holds the open documents, their edit history and the tool catalogue; frontends never reach past it into the parsing, rendering or editing crates.
- Layer: L6. It depends on most of L1–L4 and on nothing above itself. No UI toolkit —
egui,winit,eframeandrfdare forbidden below L7, andxtask layersenforces it. - The crate denies
unwrap/expect/panic!/todo!. Entry points that run untrusted-document code keep a last-resortcatch_unwindguard so an escaped panic becomes an error and the user keeps their document.
Two frontends exist on top of it today: pdfcraft-ui-egui (desktop and web) and
pdfcraft-automation (headless tools, the CLI and MCP). Anything one can do, the other must be
able to do — see AGENTS.md §3.
The editing model
Each open document holds a pdfcraft_cos::Document: the object graph plus a copy-on-write overlay.
- An edit runs on a clone. On success the previous state is pushed onto the undo stack. Clones share all unchanged data, so a snapshot is cheap — this is what makes 100 levels of undo affordable on a 200 MB file.
- After every edit the working file is produced by an incremental write: the original bytes plus one appended revision.
- The view is refreshed from those bytes, so what you see is exactly what Save will write.
- Saving rebases onto the written bytes, so the next save appends only new edits.
Consequences worth preserving: the original bytes of an opened file are never rewritten in place; a full rewrite happens only where it must (redaction, PDF/A conversion, print imposition, a changed password); and unknown data survives a round trip because nothing is reconstructed that wasn't understood.
API
let mut s = Session::new();
let id = s.open("report.pdf", Some(path), bytes, None)?; // -> DocId
s.apply(id, Edit::RotatePages { pages: vec![0], degrees: 90 })?;
let label = s.undo(id)?; // "Rotate pages"
s.redo(id)?;
let doc = s.get(id).ok_or("gone")?; // &Document: queries, never edits
doc.can_undo(); doc.editable(); doc.allows_printing();
doc.text_blocks(page); doc.page_boxes(page); doc.security_summary();
let bytes = s.save_bytes(id)?; // incremental: keeps signatures over earlier revisions valid
let bytes = s.save_full_bytes(id)?; // full rewrite, garbage-collected
s.mark_saved(id, bytes.clone(), path)?;
Edit is one enum of 75 variants — every undoable change in the product, from
RotatePages to AddAnnotation, SetFieldValue, ApplyRedactions and AddWatermark. Adding a
feature means adding a variant and handling it in apply, which is what keeps undo, the dirty
flag, autosave and the automation tools consistent for free.
Session also owns the operations that produce a new document rather than editing one:
create_blank, create_from_images, create_from_text, combine, extract, split,
split_by_size, reduced_bytes, optimized_bytes, print_pdf, export_data, and the signing
family (sign, sign_with_timestamp, timestamp_document, embed_ltv).
Modules
| Module | What it holds |
|---|---|
commands |
The command registry: id, label, menu, shortcut, and a Needs precondition encoding document security. Menus, the ⌘K palette, shortcuts and the control channel all read it, so every surface agrees on what exists and when it is enabled |
catalog |
Acrobat's "All tools" information architecture as data — groups, sections, icons, hues, and an Availability of Ready, Planned(milestone) or Provider. The UI renders what is not built yet, honestly |
actions |
PDF action dispatch (go-to, URI, named, set-layer-state, JavaScript) |
links |
Link creation, properties, and finding URLs in page text |
js |
The bridge to pdfcraft-js. forms never depends on js directly; the engine injects it, so a build without JavaScript is possible |
xfa, ocr, compare, export |
Façades over the L3/L4 crates of the same names |
Not done here
- Rendering is still borrowed.
pdfcraft-renderwrapshayroand inspects throughlopdf(ADR-0004). The engine only seesinspect() -> DocInfo,RenderPoolandtext::PageText, and that API stays frozen while M2 replaces what is behind it. - Performance budgets (
misc.performance-budgets) are not set or enforced. - Some shipped features are still reachable only from the UI, not through an
automationtool;cargo xtask paritylists them; closing that gap is tracked in the execution plan (D4).
doc.text_edit_preview(page, block) prepares a read-only page background with the selected
paragraph’s glyphs removed, preserving text positioning, images and colours. It shares the
working document’s render configuration and never enters the undo history.