Files
pdfcraft/crates/engine
ysrdevs 4b45fc9cb4 XFA: one script thread per event, and the live form kept up to date in place (#1355)
* XFA: one script thread per event, and the live form kept up to date in place

A form with hundreds of calculate scripts used to spend its open-time
budget on set-up: every script got a thread of its own, and the engine
dropped its live form after every value a script settled, rebuilding
the whole tree for the next script.

The js crate gains xfa_session::XfaSession: the scripts of one event
run on one thread (with the script stack), each in a fresh JavaScript
context or FormCalc interpreter on a copy of the form as the engine
holds it then, so scripts share nothing, a script that fails halfway
leaves nothing behind, and what a script changed reaches the next one
only through the engine. A script past its time limit is abandoned on
the thread and the session is dead from then on; a fault in the engine
(a panic) loses only that script, the thread is replaced. On wasm the
scripts run inline, as before.

The engine's runner keeps one session per event and, for a value, now
refreshes the one field in its live form in place (xfa::refresh_value,
computing the value as the tree builder would: saved values, template
defaults) instead of rebuilding the tree; rows, presence, access,
resets, relayouts and data rewrites still rebuild it. Under test, the
live form is compared with a fresh build before every script and at
the end of every event, and a difference ends the test binary (a panic
would be caught by the engine's guard and turned into a script error).

210 calculate scripts (one per row of 10 sections x 20 rows, plus a sum
per section), debug build, instrumented inside the engine: the script
event on open 495 ms -> 204 ms (of which live-form rebuilds 217 ms ->
0), on a change 300 ms -> 172 ms; through the tools, layout included,
open 1.27 s -> 0.97 s and a change 0.44 s -> 0.22 s. The rebuild cost
removed grew with form size times script count.

* CI: the GoToR tests' case lists are only grown on Unix, so Windows must not warn on their mut
2026-10-12 05:39:49 -04:00
..

pdfcraft-engine

The façade every frontend talks to. It holds the open documents, their edit history and the tool catalogue; frontends never reach past it into the parsing, rendering or editing crates.

  • Layer: L6. It depends on most of L1–L4 and on nothing above itself. No UI toolkit — egui, winit, eframe and rfd are forbidden below L7, and xtask layers enforces it.
  • The crate denies unwrap/expect/panic!/todo!. Entry points that run untrusted-document code keep a last-resort catch_unwind guard so an escaped panic becomes an error and the user keeps their document.

Two frontends exist on top of it today: pdfcraft-ui-egui (desktop and web) and pdfcraft-automation (headless tools, the CLI and MCP). Anything one can do, the other must be able to do — see AGENTS.md §3.

The editing model

Each open document holds a pdfcraft_cos::Document: the object graph plus a copy-on-write overlay.

  1. An edit runs on a clone. On success the previous state is pushed onto the undo stack. Clones share all unchanged data, so a snapshot is cheap — this is what makes 100 levels of undo affordable on a 200 MB file.
  2. After every edit the working file is produced by an incremental write: the original bytes plus one appended revision.
  3. The view is refreshed from those bytes, so what you see is exactly what Save will write.
  4. Saving rebases onto the written bytes, so the next save appends only new edits.

Consequences worth preserving: the original bytes of an opened file are never rewritten in place; a full rewrite happens only where it must (redaction, PDF/A conversion, print imposition, a changed password); and unknown data survives a round trip because nothing is reconstructed that wasn't understood.

API

let mut s = Session::new();
let id = s.open("report.pdf", Some(path), bytes, None)?;   // -> DocId

s.apply(id, Edit::RotatePages { pages: vec![0], degrees: 90 })?;
let label = s.undo(id)?;                                    // "Rotate pages"
s.redo(id)?;

let doc = s.get(id).ok_or("gone")?;                         // &Document: queries, never edits
doc.can_undo(); doc.editable(); doc.allows_printing();
doc.text_blocks(page); doc.page_boxes(page); doc.security_summary();

let bytes = s.save_bytes(id)?;        // incremental: keeps signatures over earlier revisions valid
let bytes = s.save_full_bytes(id)?;   // full rewrite, garbage-collected
s.mark_saved(id, bytes.clone(), path)?;

Edit is one enum of 75 variants — every undoable change in the product, from RotatePages to AddAnnotation, SetFieldValue, ApplyRedactions and AddWatermark. Adding a feature means adding a variant and handling it in apply, which is what keeps undo, the dirty flag, autosave and the automation tools consistent for free.

Session also owns the operations that produce a new document rather than editing one: create_blank, create_from_images, create_from_text, combine, extract, split, split_by_size, reduced_bytes, optimized_bytes, print_pdf, export_data, and the signing family (sign, sign_with_timestamp, timestamp_document, embed_ltv).

Modules

Module What it holds
commands The command registry: id, label, menu, shortcut, and a Needs precondition encoding document security. Menus, the ⌘K palette, shortcuts and the control channel all read it, so every surface agrees on what exists and when it is enabled
catalog Acrobat's "All tools" information architecture as data — groups, sections, icons, hues, and an Availability of Ready, Planned(milestone) or Provider. The UI renders what is not built yet, honestly
actions PDF action dispatch (go-to, URI, named, set-layer-state, JavaScript)
links Link creation, properties, and finding URLs in page text
js The bridge to pdfcraft-js. forms never depends on js directly; the engine injects it, so a build without JavaScript is possible
xfa, ocr, compare, export Façades over the L3/L4 crates of the same names

Not done here

  • Rendering is still borrowed. pdfcraft-render wraps hayro and inspects through lopdf (ADR-0004). The engine only sees inspect() -> DocInfo, RenderPool and text::PageText, and that API stays frozen while M2 replaces what is behind it.
  • Performance budgets (misc.performance-budgets) are not set or enforced.
  • Some shipped features are still reachable only from the UI, not through an automation tool; cargo xtask parity lists them; closing that gap is tracked in the execution plan (D4).

doc.text_edit_preview(page, block) prepares a read-only page background with the selected paragraph’s glyphs removed, preserving text positioning, images and colours. It shares the working document’s render configuration and never enters the undo history.