A build compiled with PDFCRAFT_BUILD_LABEL=<label> shows "0.7.1 (<label>)"
in `pdfcraft --version`, `pdfcraft-cli --version`, Help > About and the
first log line (pdfcraft_engine::build_info). The version itself is
unchanged, so the update check, the MCP server info and the User-Agent
still carry the release version.
packaging/linux/package.sh puts the label in the file names
(pdfcraft-0.7.1-<label>-linux-x86_64.rpm) and makes the .rpm/.deb release
`1.<label>` (nfpm `release: ${RELEASE}`, 1 when unlabelled). rpm sorts
0.7.1-1.<label> after 0.7.1-1 and before 0.7.2-1, so a locally built
package upgrades over the installed release and the next release replaces
it. packaging/env.sh accepts only letters, digits and inner dots, which
are valid in both rpm and deb release fields.
Unlabelled builds are unchanged.
Made with Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5, medium effort). It passes the
workspace quality gates (fmt, clippy, cargo test --workspace, xtask assets)
and was checked by hand on Fedora 44, but it has not been exhaustively
regression tested.
Co-authored-by: bmh129 <11478682+bmh129@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Release builds said "Text recognition isn't installed: its models are
missing" because no packaging script or release job fetched the OCR
models: only `cargo xtask models` does, into the source tree.
- packaging/env.sh gains stage_models DEST, which runs
`cargo xtask models DEST` (every ATTRIBUTION.toml kind = "model" file,
SHA-256 verified, with its licence text). No model file is named, so
the models PRs #433/#572 add ship without packaging changes.
- `cargo xtask models` also writes ATTRIBUTION.txt crediting each model
(CC-BY-SA-4.0 requires attribution when redistributed).
- macOS: PdfCraft.app/Contents/Resources/models, before signing.
- Windows: models\ beside pdfcraft.exe in the MSI (WiX v5 <Files>
harvest) and the portable zip; test-msi.ps1 checks the folder.
- Linux deb/rpm/tar.gz/AppImage, Flatpak bundle and FreeBSD tarball:
share/pdfcraft/models beside bin/. Models::search_dirs now also looks
in <exe dir>/../share/pdfcraft/models (Models::dirs_beside_exe); a
test builds every package layout on disk and finds the models in each.
release.yml and freebsd.yml check the packages contain them.
- The missing-models messages no longer tell end users to run cargo,
and the 11 catalogs that keyed an old PRINTCRAFT_MODELS wording (or
the previous one) now key the current English text; ATTRIBUTION
hashes updated. A test checks the translations match.
The web (wasm) build, which the issue reports, still has no models; this
is the desktop half only.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
On Linux, pdfcraft-cli shipped only inside the desktop packages (about
55 MB), while macOS already publishes pdfcraft-cli-<v>-macos-universal.zip.
Servers, CI and agent sandboxes only need the headless CLI.
packaging/linux/package.sh gains a `cli` format, on by default, that writes
pdfcraft-cli-<v>-linux-<arch>.tar.gz: the stripped pdfcraft-cli from the
shared staging tree plus the licences/README via copy_docs. copy_docs now
also copies NOTICE (every package benefits). The release job already
uploads and checksums every file in dist/release; its package check now
lists the archive and runs the extracted binary. README and
docs/releasing.md list the new artifact and state the glibc 2.35 baseline.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The app, crates, binaries, bundle id, packaging, icons, screenshots and docs are now
PdfCraft / pdfcraft (repo storytold/pdfcraft). On first launch the desktop app moves the
PrintCraft settings and crash-recovery folders to the new name, and both apps read settings
saved under the old storage key, so upgrades keep recent files, preferences and unsaved work.
The signing test fixtures keep their PrintCraft subject names (they are binary).
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
release.yml's comments say "See docs/releasing.md", but the workflow came
over from PhotoCraft without its document. It now describes PrintCraft's
pipeline as it is: cutting a release and test runs, every artifact
(including Windows on ARM64), the craft-fonts pin, each platform's
packaging, signing and notarization, the release-environment secrets,
and the packaging checks.
Written from release.yml and the packaging scripts. It says plainly that
the binaries don't embed the commit yet, and packaging/env.sh no longer
points to a build_info.rs that doesn't exist.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Shippori Mincho (and its OFL file) leaves assets/fonts/: the Japanese fonts now
live in storytold/craft-fonts. printcraft-fonts gets craft-fonts' build.rs recipe:
with CRAFT_FONTS_DIR=<checkout> it embeds the manifest's fonts as CRAFT_FONTS
(wasm32: only BIZ UDPGothic Regular); without it CRAFT_FONTS is empty and the
app builds, tests and runs as before, minus the Japanese face.
- SHIPPORI_MINCHO is now Option<&[u8]> from CRAFT_FONTS; japanese_glyph
(was shippori_glyph) uses document_japanese_font() (Shippori Mincho, then
BIZ UDMincho, then any Jpan face) and returns GlyphError::NoFont without one.
- Editing PDF text into Japanese without craft-fonts is a clear EditError that
leaves the page untouched.
- UI: every Jpan craft font (BIZ UDPGothic first) is the last fallback of
every egui family, sharing the same static bytes.
- Tests: Japanese glyph/edit tests skip without craft-fonts; new UI tests for
no-tofu Japanese with craft-fonts and working fonts without it.
- CI: the Linux test job checks out craft-fonts at a pinned SHA and runs the
tests with CRAFT_FONTS_DIR. Releases build every platform with it
(CRAFT_FONTS_REQUIRED=1) and ship each font's OFL as OFL-<family>.txt.
- ATTRIBUTION.toml gains [[build_input]] (checked by xtask assets); NOTICE,
AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, README and docs say fonts live in craft-fonts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
