mirror of
https://github.com/storytold/lightcraft.git
synced 2026-10-26 11:09:23 -06:00
Nathaniel LedfordandClaude Opus 5.5
7b7807b499
The dialog showed only the first problem, in place of the match count,
without saying which rule it was about. OK stayed clickable, and an
edit renamed the album before its rules were refused.
- Each rule with a problem gets the message right under its row, in the
caution colour; inside groups too, and on an empty group's frame. The
rules_editor::Env carries the problems from RuleSet::check, and each
row finds its own by path. Markers register `ruleProblem:<salt>`.
- The summary reads "Fix the marked rules to save this album." and OK is
disabled while any problem remains.
- confirm_dialog refuses problems before anything changes (not even the
name), and the control channel's ui.dialog.confirm keeps the editor
open on that error, as the button does.
- Album is its own field kind: is / isn't only (it was a number field
that offered ≥ and between). It picks its album from a list of the
plain albums (`ruleAlbum:` / `ruleAlbumItem:<id>:`) and starts with
none chosen ("choose an album"). album.ruleFields reports kind "album".
- Found while testing: the number editor's spinner clamped a stored
value outside its range as soon as it was drawn, so "Rating is 9"
quietly became "Rating is 5". It now uses
clamp_existing_to_range(false): the range limits dragging, and a
stored value stays as it is, marked by the check.
New labels (Choose an album…, No albums yet, Fix the marked rules…) are
translated in all seven locales.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>