aleleba/lightcraft
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/storytold/lightcraft.git synced 2026-10-24 10:09:01 -06:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Progress docs: target-app parity, RAW coverage vs Adobe, gaps, alpha gate, readiness by audience (#788)

Browse Source 
Progress docs per craftrules standards/progress-docs.md: target-app parity, gaps, roadmap with alpha gate, readiness by audience (full / mainstream / essentials) with Opus 5.5 hours, model-by-model RAW coverage against Adobe's camera list (docs/raw/), and format, hardware, UI and localization parity docs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Brandon Thomas
2026-10-10 14:25:15 -04:00
committed by GitHub
co-authored by Claude Opus 5.5
parent b70ae1741e
commit 964d9338ba
27 changed files with 4837 additions and 396 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
AGENTS.md
+12 -6
View File
@@ -5,12 +5,18 @@ LightCraft is a clean-room, open-source, pure-Rust photo library + non-destructi
## Start every session here
1. Read `plan/STATUS.md` (current milestone, next unchecked task, blockers).
2. Read the task in `plan/execution-plan.md` §3, the relevant section of `plan/architecture.md`, and the README/docs of the crate you touch. Behaviour/visual reference: `plan/lightroom/` (incl. `10-observed-ui.md` + screenshots).
3. **Know where we stand:** read [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) → *Where we stand* (honest assessment by dimension and
by kind of user) and *Where we're going* (ordered priorities). The checklist counts features that *exist*; the real
gaps are quality and coverage: camera colour calibration, CR3 / compressed raws, per-model verification, render
fidelity against Lightroom, AI models, HDR / video / Classic modules. A ✅ row is not proof of parity — if you find a
✅ feature that is wrong or incomplete, downgrade it to 🟡 with a note.
4. **Pick work** from [`docs/parity.md`](docs/parity.md) → *Top gaps* (ordered by user impact; the tracker has one row per feature, menu item and shortcut). When you land a feature, update its row(s) and the gap list in the same commit, and the *Where we stand* / *Where we're going* sections of `ROADMAP.md` when a listed gap closes; `cargo xtask parity` (part of `ci`) checks that every `cmd:`/`ctl:` id and path the tracker cites still exists, and `cargo xtask parity --write` refreshes its summary.
3. **Know where we stand:** read [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) (stage, headline numbers, every dimension) and, for
method and evidence, [`docs/target-app-parity.md`](docs/target-app-parity.md). The checklist counts features that
*exist*; the real gaps are quality and coverage: camera colour calibration, CR3 / compressed raws, per-model
verification, render fidelity against Lightroom, AI models, HDR / video / Classic modules (raw detail:
[`docs/raw-parity.md`](docs/raw-parity.md)). A ✅ row is not proof of parity — if you find a ✅ feature that is
wrong or incomplete, downgrade it to 🟡 with a note.
4. **Pick work** from [`docs/gaps.md`](docs/gaps.md) (ranked by user impact; `B` marks beta blockers). The row-by-row
tracker is [`docs/parity-checklist.md`](docs/parity-checklist.md) (one row per feature, menu item and shortcut).
When you land a feature, update its row(s) and the gap entry in the same commit, and the numbers in `ROADMAP.md` /
`docs/target-app-parity.md` when a listed gap closes (bump each doc's *Last updated* line and revision history, per
craftrules `standards/progress-docs.md`); `cargo xtask parity` (part of `ci`) checks that every `cmd:`/`ctl:` id and
path the tracker cites still exists, and `cargo xtask parity --write` refreshes its summary.
5. Follow the autonomous operation protocol (`plan/execution-plan.md` §7). Don't stop to ask unless §7 lists the decision as the user's.
`plan/` is gitignored (local-only).