mirror of
https://github.com/storytold/gridcraft.git
synced 2026-10-25 03:06:53 -06:00
along: =1+1+... with 4,096 operands (8,192 characters, exactly Excel's limit, which Excel accepts and calculates) overflowed the stack when entered, because the derived Clone of Expr recursed once per operand down the chain's left spine. Saving hit the same in the XLSX writer. - Expr: Clone, PartialEq, walk and map follow the left spine in a loop and recurse only into right operands and real nesting. - XLSX: _xlpm. prefixing and the implicit-intersection scan follow the spine too. The scan's depth limit of 64 wrote any chain of more than about 64 operands as a dynamic-array formula; such sums are plain formulas again (ranges in the chain still get array evaluation). - Evaluate Formula borrows sub-expressions instead of cloning each operator's subtree (quadratic memory on a long chain). - Spanish formula entry and display no longer refuse chains of more than 256 operands; the left spine does not count as nesting. Tests run on a 1 MiB stack (the Windows main thread) with Excel's observed results: formula (clone/eq/walk/map/adjust at 4,096), calc (401 and 4,096 operands, -, *, /, ^, &, %, comparisons, 1,500 refs), xlsx (long chains written as scalar formulas), engine (cell.set, fill, copy/paste, insert rows/columns, undo/redo, Evaluate Formula, XLSX save and reopen), Spanish entry. Each fails without the fix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>