Excel computes IMSQRT through the polar form, so IMSQRT("-4") is
1.22514845490862E-16+2i rather than 2i. Tests assert strings read back
from Excel; the function-parity doc lists the remaining IM* differences.
* Go To: names match in any case and script, as formulas match them
* Paste Name: only the names in view are laid out
* Docs: LAMBDA recursion limit and called error names; one Page Layout view row with the side margin marked unverified
* Go To and Paste Name: cargo fmt
Typed entry, VALUE and arithmetic now read $(1,234), $ (5) and (5)% as
negative numbers, as Excel 365 does. Parentheses no longer nest: (-5),
((5)), $5% and dates in parentheses stay text. This changes main's
((100)) from 100 to text; the no-recursion guard from #2180 is kept and
its test now asserts the new result.
Every area, array and value of one SUBTOTAL/AGGREGATE call is charged against MAX_CELLS before any cell is read; past it the call returns #NUM!. A value stored in XFD1048576 no longer makes SUBTOTAL(9,A:XFD) read ~17 billion cells into a vector.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
along: =1+1+... with 4,096 operands (8,192 characters, exactly Excel's
limit, which Excel accepts and calculates) overflowed the stack when
entered, because the derived Clone of Expr recursed once per operand
down the chain's left spine. Saving hit the same in the XLSX writer.
- Expr: Clone, PartialEq, walk and map follow the left spine in a loop
and recurse only into right operands and real nesting.
- XLSX: _xlpm. prefixing and the implicit-intersection scan follow the
spine too. The scan's depth limit of 64 wrote any chain of more than
about 64 operands as a dynamic-array formula; such sums are plain
formulas again (ranges in the chain still get array evaluation).
- Evaluate Formula borrows sub-expressions instead of cloning each
operator's subtree (quadratic memory on a long chain).
- Spanish formula entry and display no longer refuse chains of more
than 256 operands; the left spine does not count as nesting.
Tests run on a 1 MiB stack (the Windows main thread) with Excel's
observed results: formula (clone/eq/walk/map/adjust at 4,096), calc
(401 and 4,096 operands, -, *, /, ^, &, %, comparisons, 1,500 refs),
xlsx (long chains written as scalar formulas), engine (cell.set, fill,
copy/paste, insert rows/columns, undo/redo, Evaluate Formula, XLSX save
and reopen), Spanish entry. Each fails without the fix.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lower-casing then upper-casing made dotless ı equal to i (both become I),
which Unicode's default case folding keeps apart; LET(i,1,ı,2,i) could
return the ı binding. same_name now lower-cases and adds the folds lower
case misses (ß/ẞ -> ss, ſ -> s, ς -> σ). Tests cover ı/i and the Greek
final sigma.
- gridcraft_formula::same_name lower-cases then upper-cases each
character, so ß matches ẞ (to_uppercase alone maps ß to SS).
- Formula-bar input uses it too, so a binding such as ſi is not
translated to IF while the evaluator binds it.
- Tests: ISOMITTED with a case variant, ß/ẞ, and the Spanish input case.
Excel matches LET and LAMBDA names case-insensitively in every script,
so =LET(dług,100,DŁUG*2) is 200. The evaluator compared them ASCII-only
and returned #NAME?. The three lookups (name evaluation, ISOMITTED, a
LET variable shadowing a function name) now fold Unicode case.
gaps.md §6 still listed four things as missing and function-parity.md still
marked 15-significant-digit comparison as missing, citing #57 — all five
reports are closed and their PRs merged. The work list reads as the place to
pick work from, so a closed entry sends someone after work that is done.
Checked by behaviour, not by issue state, where that was possible:
=0.1+0.2=0.3 -> TRUE
=(0.1+0.2)-0.3 -> 5.55E-17 (full precision kept,
as in Excel: the 15-digit rule
is for comparison)
=MATCH(0.3,{0.30000000000000004},0) -> 1
=COUNTIF({0.30000000000000004},0.3) -> 1
a spill blocked and then unblocked -> #SPILL! then the spill again,
with its dependent back to 6
and by their regression tests for the other two:
`deleting_a_3d_span_end_sheet_keeps_the_rest` (#140) and
`sheet_operations_keep_names_on_their_sheets` (#134).
§6 is left open rather than deleted: it says wrong numbers are the worst kind of
bug, and five closed reports are not the same as the category being clear —
that needs §15's oracle suite. The function counts are untouched; this is
formula-language semantics, not the inventory.
Brandon Thomas