with_names numbered macros 0..N, and stash::set_many refuses to write a
hidden name beside a visible one of the same name, so a visible
_gc_macro_0_0 (from a file, or defined after the file opened, when the
stored names are no longer in the workbook) made every xlsx save of a
workbook with macros fail. The index is GridCraft's choice: macros now
take the free indices from 0 up, skipping every key a visible
workbook-scope name of the storage shape uses (compared as the stash
reads names), in their order. No arithmetic depends on a number from
the file.
A macro could declare an input called Q1, AB12 or Sum1, and a step written
with plain A1 text, as a recorded one is, would then resolve to the input's
range instead of the cell. check_limits refuses such names; the docs say so.
Regression test.
The inputs paragraph described how a run binds inputs and the message it
shows, which the runner adds in a later pull request. It now says what the
declaration is for and that this version stores and checks it.
Opening a workbook accepted a macro whose format version `v` was above MACRO_VERSION. Serde
dropped the fields this build doesn't know, and the next save wrote the reduced macro back
with `v: 2`, so a newer build would read it as a complete version 2 macro.
A version above MACRO_VERSION is now refused by Macro::check_limits, and parse_macro checks
the raw `v` before reading the steps. Such a macro takes the existing per-macro path: it is
left out with the usual single warning (which now names a newer format), and the rest of the
workbook opens. Tests cover JSON and xlsx hidden names, with current and missing versions as
controls.
prxnvt