* Text: a missing font is drawn in Calibri, as PowerPoint does
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Fonts: Windows family names find their faces; PowerPoint's twins for missing fonts
"Segoe UI Semibold", "Arial Black" and the like are the faces' Windows (GDI) family
names; a family's installed files now load together; Liberation Sans and Serif draw as
Arial and Times New Roman when missing, as PowerPoint draws them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Fonts: Office cloud fonts (Aptos…) keep their open substitute
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Emoji: colour glyphs, and emoji take the colour emoji font
Emoji were drawn as black outlines from a symbol font, with ZWJ sequences
(families, flags) falling apart into their parts. Now:
- an emoji cluster (emoji presentation, U+FE0F, ZWJ between pictographs,
skin tones, regional indicators, keycaps) takes an installed colour font
(COLR, CBDT, sbix or SVG tables) before the document's fonts, so its
sequences ligate as in PowerPoint; U+FE0E keeps a plain face;
- COLR v0 and v1 glyphs are painted in their CPAL colours (solid fills,
linear, radial and sweep gradients, transforms, composite modes), with
palette index 0xFFFF in the text colour.
A tiny COLRv0 test font (two squares, CC0, regenerated by
make_colr_font.py) backs the render test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Render: lock skrifa for colour glyphs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Text: single-spaced lines are 1.2 times the font size apart, as in PowerPoint
PowerPoint spaces single-spaced lines 1.2 x the font size apart in every
font (measured on twenty Latin, CJK, Thai and Indic fonts at 18 and 40 pt
with PowerPoint's slide export) and puts the baseline where the font's
Windows ascent/descent split it. DeckCraft used each font's own ascent plus
descent, so Calibri lines were 15% too tight and Segoe UI ones too loose.
FontFace gains line_split (usWinAscent / (usWinAscent + usWinDescent));
line_metrics uses it with LINE_PITCH = 1.2.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Text: tidy the line pitch test
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Fonts: line_split guard reads plainly (clippy)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Text: note that the 1.2 line pitch was measured on one Windows install
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Sprint 1: bidi and Arabic typography engine
fonts: ISO 15924 script and a:latin/a:ea/a:cs slot classification;
shape_range shapes an item with the whole paragraph as HarfRust
pre/post context, explicit script/language/direction, glyphs kept in
visual order; per-grapheme-cluster fallback (slot face, theme script
font, OS cascade families, bundled craft-fonts face); GDEF ligature
carets.
text: UAX #9 levels for the whole paragraph (a:pPr/@rtl), itemization
by level, script, face and shaping style (paint-only changes no longer
split words), logical line breaking at cluster boundaries, per-line
L1/L2 reordering (L4 mirroring by the shaper); RTL start edge and
bullets, justLow kashida; caret Affinity, logical/visual movement,
bidi hit testing and selection as the union of visual boxes.
model/pptx: theme a:font script fonts and algn="justLow" round-trip.
engine: format.rtl (Right-to-Left Text Direction), justifyLow align.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Fonts: the bundled script face comes before installed fonts; no Microsoft family names
Arabic, Hebrew, Thai and Devanagari clusters try the craft-fonts face first, so every machine
draws the same, then openly licensed or OS-native installed families, then any installed face.
Installed Microsoft faces are still used through that scan, but not named (AGENTS.md §1.1).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Tayeb <tayeb@192.168.11.179>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandon Thomas <echelon@gmail.com>
